Refine your search
Collections
Co-Authors
Year
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z All
Banyal, D. K.
- Components of Slow Mildewing in Oat Powdery Mildew Caused by Blumeria graminis F. Sp. avenae
Abstract Views :162 |
PDF Views:0
Authors
Affiliations
1 Department of Plant Pathology, CSK Himachal Pradesh Krishi Vishvavidyalaya, Palampur-176 062, IN
1 Department of Plant Pathology, CSK Himachal Pradesh Krishi Vishvavidyalaya, Palampur-176 062, IN
Source
Himachal Journal of Agricultural Research, Vol 46, No 1 (2020), Pagination: 62-68Abstract
Powdery mildew of oat (Blumeria graminis f. sp. avenae) is the most deleterious foliar disease of cultivated oat, particularly in cooler regions. Slow mildewing, a partial resistance behaves genetically as a quantitative trait and can be assessed by comparing with mildew development on a highly susceptible cultivar grown under the same conditions. The slow mildewing components (disease severity, AUDPC and infection rate) under field conditions were studied in 15 moderately susceptible along with highly susceptible check (HJ-8) selected from panel of 303 field screened oat genotypes. The lines were categorized into slow mildewing categories based on terminal disease severity and AUDPC values. The AUDPC values of these lines ranged from 475 (JPO-45) to 1775 (HJ-8) and infection rate ranged from 0.053 to 0.144, being minimum in JPO-45 and maximum in HJ-8. All the tested lines gave 3 or 4 infection type under greenhouse evaluation and were designated as moderately susceptible and susceptible genotypes. Three oat lines showing moderately susceptible reactions, along with HJ-8 were selected to carry out experiment on slow mildewing in greenhouse. Among all the selected lines, the incubation period varied between 3-4 days and latent period between 4-5 days, i.e. maximum of 4 and 5 days, as compared to minimum of 3 and 4 days in HJ-8, respectively. After 11 days of inoculation, countless conidiophores bearing conidia were produced on all the lines except in IG-03-203. The size of powdery mildew colony was recorded and maximum colony size 3.87 mm was observed in HJ-8 followed by 2.87, 3.37 and 3.30 mm in IG-03-203, JPO-20 and KRR-AK-06, respectively.Keywords
Oat, Powdery Mildew, Area Under Disease Progress Curve (AUDPC), Infection Rate, Slow Mildewing.References
- Anonymous, 2017. Annual Reports-Rabi, forage crop protection 2016-17. Pp. 152-170.
- Anonymous. 2016. Annual Reports-Rabi, forage crop protection 2015-16. Pp. 118-136.
- Arushi, Malannavar AB and Banyal DK. 2018. Studies on biology and environmental factors affecting the development of tomato powdery mildew under protected cultivation. Indian Phytopathology 71: 385-391.
- Banyal DK, Singh Amar and Tyagi PD. 2005. Pathogenic variability in Erysiphe pisi pea powdery mildew. Himachal Journal of Agricultural Research 31: 87-92.
- Banyal DK, Chaudhary J and Singh Amar. 2015. Evaluation of pea (Pisum sativum) germplasm for inheritance of resistance to powdery mildew (Erysiphe pisi). Indian Phytopathology 68(2):166–171.
- Banyal DK, Sood VK, Singh Amar and Mawar Ritu. 2016. Integrated management of oat diseases in North-western Himalaya. Range Management and Agroforestry 37 (1): 84-87.
- Chaudhary J and Banyal DK. 2016. Study of slow mildewing components of powdery mildew of pea caused by Erysiphe pisi. Plant Disease Research 31(2): 138-141.
- Chen XM. 2005. Epidemiology and control of stripe rust [Puccinia striiformis f.sp. tritici] on wheat. Canadian Journal of Plant Pathology 27: 314-337.
- Conner RL, Kuzyk AD and Su H. 2003. Impact of powdery mildew on the yield of soft white spring wheat cultivars. Canadian Journal of Plant Science 83: 725-728.
- Harneet Kaur. 2019. Eco-friendly management of wheat powdery mildew caused by Blumeria graminis tritici. M. Sc thesis. CSKHPKV, Palampur. Pp. 41-75.
- Jones IT, Roderick HW and Clifford BC. 1987. The integration of host resistance with fungicides in the control of oat powdery mildew. Annals of Applied Biology 110: 591-602.
- Parlevliet JE. 1979. Components of resistance that reduce the rate of epidemic development. Annual Review of Phytopathology 17: 203-232.
- Saari EE and Prescott JM. 1975. A scale for appraising the foliar intensity of wheat disease. Plant Disease Report 59: 377-380.
- Sangwan O, Avtar R, Arora RN and Singh A. 2012. Variability and character association studies in fodder oat (Avena sativa L.). Forage Research 38: 56-58.
- Shaner G and Finney RE. 1977. The effect of nitrogen fertilization on the expression of slow mildewing resistance in Knox wheat. Phytopathology 67(9): 1051-1056.
- Sthapit J, Gbur EE, Brown GG, Marshall DS and Milus EA. 2012. Characterization of resistance to stripe rust in contemporary cultivars and lines of winter wheat from the eastern United States. Plant Disease 96: 737-745.
- Vander Plank JR. 1963. Plant Diseases: Epidemics and control. Academic Press, London p 24.
- Evaluation of IDM Components for the Management of Urdbean Anthracnose Caused by Colletotrichum truncatum (Schwein) Andrus and Moore
Abstract Views :487 |
PDF Views:0
Authors
Affiliations
1 Department of Plant Pathology, CSK Himachal Pradesh Krishi Vishvavidyalaya, Palampur-176 062, IN
1 Department of Plant Pathology, CSK Himachal Pradesh Krishi Vishvavidyalaya, Palampur-176 062, IN
Source
Himachal Journal of Agricultural Research, Vol 46, No 2 (2020), Pagination: 156-161Abstract
Urdbean (Vigna mungo L. Hepper) also known as mash or blackgram is important Kharif pulse.It suffers from many diseases in which anthracnose leaf spot caused by Colletotrichum truncatum (Schwein) Andrus and Moore occur in endemic form in high rainfall areas and result in qualitative and quantitative yield losses. The field experiments on integrated management of anthracnose revealed that among organic and natural inputs, three sprays of panchgavya (@10%) at ten days interval gave maximum disease control of 33.64 per cent with 26.14 per cent yield increase whereas crude extract of botanicals i.e. Melia azedarach (Darek), Eucalyptus sp. (eucalyptus), Eupatorium odoratum (Basuti) and Lantana camera (lantana) three foliar sprays of eucalyptus (@30%) at 10 days interval gave maximum disease control of 28.18 per cent with 21.62 per cent increase in yield. The seed treatment with bioagents viz; Trichoderma koningii (DMA-8), Trichoderma koningii (JMA-11), Trichoderma harzianum (SMA-5), Trichoderma harzianum (TH-11) and Trichoderma viride was less effective and gave only 4.88 to 10.98 disease control with 2.79 to 6.04 per cent yield increase. all the five fungicides viz; mancozeb 75WP, carbendazim 50WP, propiconazole 25EC, tebuconazole 25EC and trifloxystrobin 25% + tebuconazole 50% were found effective and gave 42.58 to 77.99 per cent disease control with 33.12 to 43.18 per cent yield increase over check.Keywords
Urdbean, Anthracnose, Colletotrichum truncatum, IDM Components.References
- Anonymous. 2011. Urad: Favorable policies needed to meet rising demand. The Hindu Business line. article no. 20357895.
- Anonymous. 2018. Annual report 2017-2018 Directorate of Pulse Development, Govt. of India.
- Anonymous 2018. e-Pulses data book. http://www.iipr.res.in/e-pulse-data-book
- Ashlesha and Paul YS. 2014. Antifungal bioefficacy of organic inputs against fungal pathogens of bell pepper. Paripex Indian Journal of Research 3: 4-6.
- Bhardwaj CL and Thakur DR. 1991. Economic management of blackgram (Phaseolus mungo) diseases with fungicides. Indian Journal of Agricultural Sciences 61: 437-439.
- Choudhari CS, Jain SC, Kumar R and Choudhary JS. 2013. Efficacy of different fungicides, biocides and botanical extract seed treatment for controlling seed borne Colletotrichum sp. in chilli (Capsicum annuum L.). The Bioscan 8: 00-00.
- Choudhary RS, Simon S and Bana SR. 2017. Efficacy of plant extracts against anthracnose (Colletotrichum lindemuthianum) of green gram (Vigna radiata). International Journal of Chemical Studies 5: 769-772.
- Gawade DB, Suryawanshi AP, Pawar AK, Apet KT and Devgire SS. 2009. Field evaluation of fungicides, botanicals and bioagents against anthracnose of soybean. Agriculture Science Digest 23: 174-177.
- Gupta O, Gurha SN and Trivedi S. 2007. Ecofriendly management of anthracnose disease of urdbean. In: Ecofriendly management of Plant Diseases (S Ahmad and U Narain, eds) Daya Publishing House, New Delhi. P.453
- Joshi D and Tripathi HS. 2002. Cultural, biological and chemical control of anthracnose of urdbean. Journal of Mycology and Plant Pathology 32: 52.
- Kaur G. 2018. Variability of Phytophthora nicotianae var. parasitica causing buckeye rot of tomato and its sensitivity to fungicides. MSc Thesis, p.22-36. Department of Plant Pathology, CSKHPKV, Palampur.
- Saxena RM and Sinha S. 1977. Seed borne infection of Vigna mungo in Uttar Pradesh. Indian Phytopathology 30: 582 583.
- Sharma R. 1996. Studies pathogenic variation in Colletotrichum truncatum and resistance in urdbean to the pathogen. MSc Thesis, Department of Plant Pathology, CSKHPKV, Palampur. p 25-51.
- Singh RR and Shukla P. 1988. Colletotrichum leaf blight of blackgram. Journal of Farm Science 3: 97-102.
- Subedi S, Gharti DB, Neupane S and Ghimire T. 2015. Management of anthracnose I soybean using fungicide. Journal of Nepal Agriculture Research Council1:29-32.
- Trivedi A, Sharma SK, Ameta OP and Sharma SK. 2014. Management of viral and leaf spot diseases complex in organic farming of black-gram. Indian Phytopathology 67: 97-101.
- Singh AK, Pandey BT, Swarnam VK, Swain TP, Sachchidananda PK, Velmurugan SK, Ahmed Z, Gautam RK and Roy SD. 2016. Technologies for increasing mungbean and urdbean production in Andaman & Nicobar Islands. ICAR-Central Island Agricultural Research Institute Port Blair, India-CARI/TSP-Pulse Bulletin/2015-16/07.